Tuesday, March 13, 2018

So No Collusion Just Bad Judgement?

You have to give Nunes credit, he doesn't mind letting everyone know he is a partisan with no pretense at all.

The draft document said that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians while contradicting an official U.S. intelligence community assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin favored President Trump during the campaign.

"We found no evidence of collusion," Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) told reporters on Monday. "We found perhaps some bad judgment, inappropriate meetings, inappropriate judgment in taking meetings - but only Tom Clancy could take this series of inadvertent contacts, meetings, whatever, and weave that into some sort of a spy thriller that could go out there.
So those scheduled meetings were inadvertent?  Odd how that happens.  Guess you can't expect people to be there just because they said they would.
There's little doubt that the Russians tried to manipulate the election and that certain members of the campaign knew about it, maybe even the dotard himself.  Considering all his other bad traits, its pretty believable that he wouldn't think there was anything wrong in this.  
Not sure it matters much at this point but it is probably a more relevant inquiry than the silly e-mail thing that keeps dragging on about Hillary.
Saying these people exercise bad judgment is sort of a redundant situation.  When did they exercise good judgment?
I guess the people who voted for him might want to think about it, but if you have bought into the argument that he is the victim, you ignore all of this anyway.




No comments:

Post a Comment