Not Presidential

The question you have to ask is the performance yesterday in Finland, an act of knowing sedition or simply an act of idiocy?

I imagine using that approach in every interrogation, well he strongly says he didn't do it, so guess we have to let him go.  But what about all that evidence our people have gathered?  Well he says he didn't do it and he seemed pretty positive about it.

There is enough evidence of Russian involvement to convince even the so called intelligence committees in the house and senate so it must be quite persuasive.

This is the problem with the dontard.  He doesn't have a sense of perspective or any understanding of real issues.

He spends his time playing the role of president rather than being the president.  His experience in business didn't prepare him, he inherited it and was always the boss.

The president isn't the boss.  The executive branch has an equal role with the other two branches, something we call checks and balances.

The founding fathers would be mostly aghast at how much president get involved in this day to day politicking.

They envisioned the job as being the administrator of the operation, running the government efficiently based on what the legislature passed.

Not being naïve, they knew he would have some involvement, but more in the way of a senior advisor who might every so often have to veto something that was either unworkable or against the best interests of the nation.

Clearly presidents have become much more involved in mundane politics, but we never had one quite as inept as this one.